I often use Bing when scrolling around because it loads faster. But the Maxar imagery for my area is 3 years newer, and often sharper. For a really close look I’m lucky enough to have super high resolution aerial photography taken in the spring before the leaves open, so I can actually see what is beneath the canopy. Though that last option is the slowest because of the city’s webserver.
OpenStreetMap
Eztabaida
Vincent de Phily erabiltzailearen iruzkina 19 Maiatza 2020 11:39-eann
Why restrict yourself ? There are other sources at our disposal, and Bing isn’t always the best.
gecho111 erabiltzailearen iruzkina 22 Maiatza 2020 01:03-eann
I often use Bing when scrolling around because it loads faster. But the Maxar imagery for my area is 3 years newer, and often sharper. For a really close look I’m lucky enough to have super high resolution aerial photography taken in the spring before the leaves open, so I can actually see what is beneath the canopy. Though that last option is the slowest because of the city’s webserver.
jimkats erabiltzailearen iruzkina 24 Maiatza 2020 12:03-eann
Bing’s aerial imagery is outdated and low quality. I usually cross-check with Google’s aerial imagery which is higher quality and more recent.