I often use Bing when scrolling around because it loads faster. But the Maxar imagery for my area is 3 years newer, and often sharper. For a really close look I’m lucky enough to have super high resolution aerial photography taken in the spring before the leaves open, so I can actually see what is beneath the canopy. Though that last option is the slowest because of the city’s webserver.
דיון
תגובה מאת Vincent de Phily על 19 במאי 2020 בשעה 11:39
Why restrict yourself ? There are other sources at our disposal, and Bing isn’t always the best.
תגובה מאת gecho111 על 22 במאי 2020 בשעה 01:03
I often use Bing when scrolling around because it loads faster. But the Maxar imagery for my area is 3 years newer, and often sharper. For a really close look I’m lucky enough to have super high resolution aerial photography taken in the spring before the leaves open, so I can actually see what is beneath the canopy. Though that last option is the slowest because of the city’s webserver.
תגובה מאת jimkats על 24 במאי 2020 בשעה 12:03
Bing’s aerial imagery is outdated and low quality. I usually cross-check with Google’s aerial imagery which is higher quality and more recent.