I often use Bing when scrolling around because it loads faster. But the Maxar imagery for my area is 3 years newer, and often sharper. For a really close look I’m lucky enough to have super high resolution aerial photography taken in the spring before the leaves open, so I can actually see what is beneath the canopy. Though that last option is the slowest because of the city’s webserver.
Discussion
ایہہ 19؍May 2020ء 11:39 تے «Vincent de Phily» ٹپݨی کیتی گئی سی۔
Why restrict yourself ? There are other sources at our disposal, and Bing isn’t always the best.
ایہہ 22؍May 2020ء 01:03 تے «gecho111» ٹپݨی کیتی گئی سی۔
I often use Bing when scrolling around because it loads faster. But the Maxar imagery for my area is 3 years newer, and often sharper. For a really close look I’m lucky enough to have super high resolution aerial photography taken in the spring before the leaves open, so I can actually see what is beneath the canopy. Though that last option is the slowest because of the city’s webserver.
ایہہ 24؍May 2020ء 12:03 تے «jimkats» ٹپݨی کیتی گئی سی۔
Bing’s aerial imagery is outdated and low quality. I usually cross-check with Google’s aerial imagery which is higher quality and more recent.