I often use Bing when scrolling around because it loads faster. But the Maxar imagery for my area is 3 years newer, and often sharper. For a really close look I’m lucky enough to have super high resolution aerial photography taken in the spring before the leaves open, so I can actually see what is beneath the canopy. Though that last option is the slowest because of the city’s webserver.
Diskussion
Kommentar von Vincent de Phily am 19. Mai 2020 um 11:39 Uhr
Why restrict yourself ? There are other sources at our disposal, and Bing isn’t always the best.
Kommentar von gecho111 am 22. Mai 2020 um 01:03 Uhr
I often use Bing when scrolling around because it loads faster. But the Maxar imagery for my area is 3 years newer, and often sharper. For a really close look I’m lucky enough to have super high resolution aerial photography taken in the spring before the leaves open, so I can actually see what is beneath the canopy. Though that last option is the slowest because of the city’s webserver.
Kommentar von jimkats am 24. Mai 2020 um 12:03 Uhr
Bing’s aerial imagery is outdated and low quality. I usually cross-check with Google’s aerial imagery which is higher quality and more recent.