I often use Bing when scrolling around because it loads faster. But the Maxar imagery for my area is 3 years newer, and often sharper. For a really close look I’m lucky enough to have super high resolution aerial photography taken in the spring before the leaves open, so I can actually see what is beneath the canopy. Though that last option is the slowest because of the city’s webserver.
OpenStreetMap
Разговор
Коментар од Vincent de Phily во 19 Мај 2020 г. во 11:39 ч.
Why restrict yourself ? There are other sources at our disposal, and Bing isn’t always the best.
Коментар од gecho111 во 22 Мај 2020 г. во 01:03 ч.
I often use Bing when scrolling around because it loads faster. But the Maxar imagery for my area is 3 years newer, and often sharper. For a really close look I’m lucky enough to have super high resolution aerial photography taken in the spring before the leaves open, so I can actually see what is beneath the canopy. Though that last option is the slowest because of the city’s webserver.
Коментар од jimkats во 24 Мај 2020 г. во 12:03 ч.
Bing’s aerial imagery is outdated and low quality. I usually cross-check with Google’s aerial imagery which is higher quality and more recent.