I often use Bing when scrolling around because it loads faster. But the Maxar imagery for my area is 3 years newer, and often sharper. For a really close look I’m lucky enough to have super high resolution aerial photography taken in the spring before the leaves open, so I can actually see what is beneath the canopy. Though that last option is the slowest because of the city’s webserver.
OpenStreetMap
Discussion
Comment from Vincent de Phily on %დ %თ %წ at %ს:%წ
Why restrict yourself ? There are other sources at our disposal, and Bing isn’t always the best.
Comment from gecho111 on %დ %თ %წ at %ს:%წ
I often use Bing when scrolling around because it loads faster. But the Maxar imagery for my area is 3 years newer, and often sharper. For a really close look I’m lucky enough to have super high resolution aerial photography taken in the spring before the leaves open, so I can actually see what is beneath the canopy. Though that last option is the slowest because of the city’s webserver.
Comment from jimkats on %დ %თ %წ at %ს:%წ
Bing’s aerial imagery is outdated and low quality. I usually cross-check with Google’s aerial imagery which is higher quality and more recent.