I often use Bing when scrolling around because it loads faster. But the Maxar imagery for my area is 3 years newer, and often sharper. For a really close look I’m lucky enough to have super high resolution aerial photography taken in the spring before the leaves open, so I can actually see what is beneath the canopy. Though that last option is the slowest because of the city’s webserver.
Tartışma
Vincent de Phily tarafından 19 Mayıs 2020 saat 11.39 tarihinde yapılan yorum
Why restrict yourself ? There are other sources at our disposal, and Bing isn’t always the best.
gecho111 tarafından 22 Mayıs 2020 saat 01.03 tarihinde yapılan yorum
I often use Bing when scrolling around because it loads faster. But the Maxar imagery for my area is 3 years newer, and often sharper. For a really close look I’m lucky enough to have super high resolution aerial photography taken in the spring before the leaves open, so I can actually see what is beneath the canopy. Though that last option is the slowest because of the city’s webserver.
jimkats tarafından 24 Mayıs 2020 saat 12.03 tarihinde yapılan yorum
Bing’s aerial imagery is outdated and low quality. I usually cross-check with Google’s aerial imagery which is higher quality and more recent.