I often use Bing when scrolling around because it loads faster. But the Maxar imagery for my area is 3 years newer, and often sharper. For a really close look I’m lucky enough to have super high resolution aerial photography taken in the spring before the leaves open, so I can actually see what is beneath the canopy. Though that last option is the slowest because of the city’s webserver.
OpenStreetMap
Discussion
ߡߙߌߣߊ߲ ߞߊ߬ ߝߘߊ߫ Vincent de Phily ߟߊ߫ 19 May 2020 at 11:39 ߘߐ߫
Why restrict yourself ? There are other sources at our disposal, and Bing isn’t always the best.
ߡߙߌߣߊ߲ ߞߊ߬ ߝߘߊ߫ gecho111 ߟߊ߫ 22 May 2020 at 01:03 ߘߐ߫
I often use Bing when scrolling around because it loads faster. But the Maxar imagery for my area is 3 years newer, and often sharper. For a really close look I’m lucky enough to have super high resolution aerial photography taken in the spring before the leaves open, so I can actually see what is beneath the canopy. Though that last option is the slowest because of the city’s webserver.
ߡߙߌߣߊ߲ ߞߊ߬ ߝߘߊ߫ jimkats ߟߊ߫ 24 May 2020 at 12:03 ߘߐ߫
Bing’s aerial imagery is outdated and low quality. I usually cross-check with Google’s aerial imagery which is higher quality and more recent.