I often use Bing when scrolling around because it loads faster. But the Maxar imagery for my area is 3 years newer, and often sharper. For a really close look I’m lucky enough to have super high resolution aerial photography taken in the spring before the leaves open, so I can actually see what is beneath the canopy. Though that last option is the slowest because of the city’s webserver.
OpenStreetMap
Discussion
Cummentu dae Vincent de Phily de su 19 maju 2020 a is 11:39
Why restrict yourself ? There are other sources at our disposal, and Bing isn’t always the best.
Cummentu dae gecho111 de su 22 maju 2020 a is 01:03
I often use Bing when scrolling around because it loads faster. But the Maxar imagery for my area is 3 years newer, and often sharper. For a really close look I’m lucky enough to have super high resolution aerial photography taken in the spring before the leaves open, so I can actually see what is beneath the canopy. Though that last option is the slowest because of the city’s webserver.
Cummentu dae jimkats de su 24 maju 2020 a is 12:03
Bing’s aerial imagery is outdated and low quality. I usually cross-check with Google’s aerial imagery which is higher quality and more recent.