My personal view is that I want the data I contribute to continue to be available and of use, even if the worst were to happen, and OSM were to disappear, so I opted for PD. Yes, some people might then try and sell it, but there's more chance others will continue to provide it for free so they will be less successful at this.
OpenStreetMap
Diskussion
Kommentar von Olli17 am 25. November 2010 um 13:54 Uhr
It was an mistake you did. OSM should be under cc-by-sa and not under this new licence.
Kommentar von Zartbitter am 25. November 2010 um 16:39 Uhr
it is not up to others to judge on hackery's decision.
Kommentar von Komяpa am 26. November 2010 um 07:15 Uhr
Olli17, any better arguments than "should be"?
Kommentar von c2r am 28. November 2010 um 09:53 Uhr
My personal view is that I want the data I contribute to continue to be available and of use, even if the worst were to happen, and OSM were to disappear, so I opted for PD. Yes, some people might then try and sell it, but there's more chance others will continue to provide it for free so they will be less successful at this.