My personal view is that I want the data I contribute to continue to be available and of use, even if the worst were to happen, and OSM were to disappear, so I opted for PD. Yes, some people might then try and sell it, but there's more chance others will continue to provide it for free so they will be less successful at this.
OpenStreetMap
Discusión
Comentario de Olli17 el 25 de noviembre de 2010 a las 13:54
It was an mistake you did. OSM should be under cc-by-sa and not under this new licence.
Comentario de Zartbitter el 25 de noviembre de 2010 a las 16:39
it is not up to others to judge on hackery's decision.
Comentario de Komяpa el 26 de noviembre de 2010 a las 07:15
Olli17, any better arguments than "should be"?
Comentario de c2r el 28 de noviembre de 2010 a las 09:53
My personal view is that I want the data I contribute to continue to be available and of use, even if the worst were to happen, and OSM were to disappear, so I opted for PD. Yes, some people might then try and sell it, but there's more chance others will continue to provide it for free so they will be less successful at this.