My personal view is that I want the data I contribute to continue to be available and of use, even if the worst were to happen, and OSM were to disappear, so I opted for PD. Yes, some people might then try and sell it, but there's more chance others will continue to provide it for free so they will be less successful at this.
Diskuto
Komento de Olli17 je 25 novembro 2010 je 13:54
It was an mistake you did. OSM should be under cc-by-sa and not under this new licence.
Komento de Zartbitter je 25 novembro 2010 je 16:39
it is not up to others to judge on hackery's decision.
Komento de Komяpa je 26 novembro 2010 je 07:15
Olli17, any better arguments than "should be"?
Komento de c2r je 28 novembro 2010 je 09:53
My personal view is that I want the data I contribute to continue to be available and of use, even if the worst were to happen, and OSM were to disappear, so I opted for PD. Yes, some people might then try and sell it, but there's more chance others will continue to provide it for free so they will be less successful at this.