My personal view is that I want the data I contribute to continue to be available and of use, even if the worst were to happen, and OSM were to disappear, so I opted for PD. Yes, some people might then try and sell it, but there's more chance others will continue to provide it for free so they will be less successful at this.
OpenStreetMap
Discussion
Commentaire de Olli17 le 25 novembre 2010 à 13 h 54
It was an mistake you did. OSM should be under cc-by-sa and not under this new licence.
Commentaire de Zartbitter le 25 novembre 2010 à 16 h 39
it is not up to others to judge on hackery's decision.
Commentaire de Komяpa le 26 novembre 2010 à 7 h 15
Olli17, any better arguments than "should be"?
Commentaire de c2r le 28 novembre 2010 à 9 h 53
My personal view is that I want the data I contribute to continue to be available and of use, even if the worst were to happen, and OSM were to disappear, so I opted for PD. Yes, some people might then try and sell it, but there's more chance others will continue to provide it for free so they will be less successful at this.