My personal view is that I want the data I contribute to continue to be available and of use, even if the worst were to happen, and OSM were to disappear, so I opted for PD. Yes, some people might then try and sell it, but there's more chance others will continue to provide it for free so they will be less successful at this.
OpenStreetMap
Discussione
Commento di Olli17 il 25 novembre 2010 alle 13:54
It was an mistake you did. OSM should be under cc-by-sa and not under this new licence.
Commento di Zartbitter il 25 novembre 2010 alle 16:39
it is not up to others to judge on hackery's decision.
Commento di Komяpa il 26 novembre 2010 alle 07:15
Olli17, any better arguments than "should be"?
Commento di c2r il 28 novembre 2010 alle 09:53
My personal view is that I want the data I contribute to continue to be available and of use, even if the worst were to happen, and OSM were to disappear, so I opted for PD. Yes, some people might then try and sell it, but there's more chance others will continue to provide it for free so they will be less successful at this.