My personal view is that I want the data I contribute to continue to be available and of use, even if the worst were to happen, and OSM were to disappear, so I opted for PD. Yes, some people might then try and sell it, but there's more chance others will continue to provide it for free so they will be less successful at this.
OpenStreetMap
Pogovor
Komentar uporabnika Olli17 dne 25. november 2010 ob 13:54
It was an mistake you did. OSM should be under cc-by-sa and not under this new licence.
Komentar uporabnika Zartbitter dne 25. november 2010 ob 16:39
it is not up to others to judge on hackery's decision.
Komentar uporabnika Komяpa dne 26. november 2010 ob 07:15
Olli17, any better arguments than "should be"?
Komentar uporabnika c2r dne 28. november 2010 ob 09:53
My personal view is that I want the data I contribute to continue to be available and of use, even if the worst were to happen, and OSM were to disappear, so I opted for PD. Yes, some people might then try and sell it, but there's more chance others will continue to provide it for free so they will be less successful at this.