My personal view is that I want the data I contribute to continue to be available and of use, even if the worst were to happen, and OSM were to disappear, so I opted for PD. Yes, some people might then try and sell it, but there's more chance others will continue to provide it for free so they will be less successful at this.
OpenStreetMap
Discussion
Komentārs no Olli17 @ 25 novembrī 2010 @ 13:54
It was an mistake you did. OSM should be under cc-by-sa and not under this new licence.
Komentārs no Zartbitter @ 25 novembrī 2010 @ 16:39
it is not up to others to judge on hackery's decision.
Komentārs no Komяpa @ 26 novembrī 2010 @ 07:15
Olli17, any better arguments than "should be"?
Komentārs no c2r @ 28 novembrī 2010 @ 09:53
My personal view is that I want the data I contribute to continue to be available and of use, even if the worst were to happen, and OSM were to disappear, so I opted for PD. Yes, some people might then try and sell it, but there's more chance others will continue to provide it for free so they will be less successful at this.