My personal view is that I want the data I contribute to continue to be available and of use, even if the worst were to happen, and OSM were to disappear, so I opted for PD. Yes, some people might then try and sell it, but there's more chance others will continue to provide it for free so they will be less successful at this.
OpenStreetMap
Discussion
ߡߙߌߣߊ߲ ߞߊ߬ ߝߘߊ߫ Olli17 ߟߊ߫ 25 November 2010 at 13:54 ߘߐ߫
It was an mistake you did. OSM should be under cc-by-sa and not under this new licence.
ߡߙߌߣߊ߲ ߞߊ߬ ߝߘߊ߫ Zartbitter ߟߊ߫ 25 November 2010 at 16:39 ߘߐ߫
it is not up to others to judge on hackery's decision.
ߡߙߌߣߊ߲ ߞߊ߬ ߝߘߊ߫ Komяpa ߟߊ߫ 26 November 2010 at 07:15 ߘߐ߫
Olli17, any better arguments than "should be"?
ߡߙߌߣߊ߲ ߞߊ߬ ߝߘߊ߫ c2r ߟߊ߫ 28 November 2010 at 09:53 ߘߐ߫
My personal view is that I want the data I contribute to continue to be available and of use, even if the worst were to happen, and OSM were to disappear, so I opted for PD. Yes, some people might then try and sell it, but there's more chance others will continue to provide it for free so they will be less successful at this.