My personal view is that I want the data I contribute to continue to be available and of use, even if the worst were to happen, and OSM were to disappear, so I opted for PD. Yes, some people might then try and sell it, but there's more chance others will continue to provide it for free so they will be less successful at this.
اوپناستریتمپ
Discussion
نظر از Olli17 در 25 نوامبر 2010 ساعت 13:54
It was an mistake you did. OSM should be under cc-by-sa and not under this new licence.
نظر از Zartbitter در 25 نوامبر 2010 ساعت 16:39
it is not up to others to judge on hackery's decision.
نظر از Komяpa در 26 نوامبر 2010 ساعت 07:15
Olli17, any better arguments than "should be"?
نظر از c2r در 28 نوامبر 2010 ساعت 09:53
My personal view is that I want the data I contribute to continue to be available and of use, even if the worst were to happen, and OSM were to disappear, so I opted for PD. Yes, some people might then try and sell it, but there's more chance others will continue to provide it for free so they will be less successful at this.