My personal view is that I want the data I contribute to continue to be available and of use, even if the worst were to happen, and OSM were to disappear, so I opted for PD. Yes, some people might then try and sell it, but there's more chance others will continue to provide it for free so they will be less successful at this.
OpenStreetMap
讨论
Olli17 于 2010年11月25日 13:54 的评论
It was an mistake you did. OSM should be under cc-by-sa and not under this new licence.
Zartbitter 于 2010年11月25日 16:39 的评论
it is not up to others to judge on hackery's decision.
Komяpa 于 2010年11月26日 07:15 的评论
Olli17, any better arguments than "should be"?
c2r 于 2010年11月28日 09:53 的评论
My personal view is that I want the data I contribute to continue to be available and of use, even if the worst were to happen, and OSM were to disappear, so I opted for PD. Yes, some people might then try and sell it, but there's more chance others will continue to provide it for free so they will be less successful at this.