My personal view is that I want the data I contribute to continue to be available and of use, even if the worst were to happen, and OSM were to disappear, so I opted for PD. Yes, some people might then try and sell it, but there's more chance others will continue to provide it for free so they will be less successful at this.
OpenStreetMap
Keskustelu
Kommentti käyttäjältä Olli17 25. marraskuuta 2010 klo 13.54
It was an mistake you did. OSM should be under cc-by-sa and not under this new licence.
Kommentti käyttäjältä Zartbitter 25. marraskuuta 2010 klo 16.39
it is not up to others to judge on hackery's decision.
Kommentti käyttäjältä Komяpa 26. marraskuuta 2010 klo 07.15
Olli17, any better arguments than "should be"?
Kommentti käyttäjältä c2r 28. marraskuuta 2010 klo 09.53
My personal view is that I want the data I contribute to continue to be available and of use, even if the worst were to happen, and OSM were to disappear, so I opted for PD. Yes, some people might then try and sell it, but there's more chance others will continue to provide it for free so they will be less successful at this.