My personal view is that I want the data I contribute to continue to be available and of use, even if the worst were to happen, and OSM were to disappear, so I opted for PD. Yes, some people might then try and sell it, but there's more chance others will continue to provide it for free so they will be less successful at this.
OpenStreetMap
Discussion
Awennit n Olli17 di 25 November 2010 ɣef 13:54
It was an mistake you did. OSM should be under cc-by-sa and not under this new licence.
Awennit n Zartbitter di 25 November 2010 ɣef 16:39
it is not up to others to judge on hackery's decision.
Awennit n Komяpa di 26 November 2010 ɣef 07:15
Olli17, any better arguments than "should be"?
Awennit n c2r di 28 November 2010 ɣef 09:53
My personal view is that I want the data I contribute to continue to be available and of use, even if the worst were to happen, and OSM were to disappear, so I opted for PD. Yes, some people might then try and sell it, but there's more chance others will continue to provide it for free so they will be less successful at this.