My personal view is that I want the data I contribute to continue to be available and of use, even if the worst were to happen, and OSM were to disappear, so I opted for PD. Yes, some people might then try and sell it, but there's more chance others will continue to provide it for free so they will be less successful at this.
OpenStreetMap
Diskusia
Komentár od používateľa Olli17 z 25. November 2010 o 13:54
It was an mistake you did. OSM should be under cc-by-sa and not under this new licence.
Komentár od používateľa Zartbitter z 25. November 2010 o 16:39
it is not up to others to judge on hackery's decision.
Komentár od používateľa Komяpa z 26. November 2010 o 07:15
Olli17, any better arguments than "should be"?
Komentár od používateľa c2r z 28. November 2010 o 09:53
My personal view is that I want the data I contribute to continue to be available and of use, even if the worst were to happen, and OSM were to disappear, so I opted for PD. Yes, some people might then try and sell it, but there's more chance others will continue to provide it for free so they will be less successful at this.