My personal view is that I want the data I contribute to continue to be available and of use, even if the worst were to happen, and OSM were to disappear, so I opted for PD. Yes, some people might then try and sell it, but there's more chance others will continue to provide it for free so they will be less successful at this.
OpenStreetMap
Diskusi
Komentar dari Olli17 pada 25 November 2010 pada 13:54
It was an mistake you did. OSM should be under cc-by-sa and not under this new licence.
Komentar dari Zartbitter pada 25 November 2010 pada 16:39
it is not up to others to judge on hackery's decision.
Komentar dari Komяpa pada 26 November 2010 pada 07:15
Olli17, any better arguments than "should be"?
Komentar dari c2r pada 28 November 2010 pada 09:53
My personal view is that I want the data I contribute to continue to be available and of use, even if the worst were to happen, and OSM were to disappear, so I opted for PD. Yes, some people might then try and sell it, but there's more chance others will continue to provide it for free so they will be less successful at this.