My personal view is that I want the data I contribute to continue to be available and of use, even if the worst were to happen, and OSM were to disappear, so I opted for PD. Yes, some people might then try and sell it, but there's more chance others will continue to provide it for free so they will be less successful at this.
OpenStreetMap
Discussão
Comentário de Olli17 em 25 de novembro de 2010 às 13:54
It was an mistake you did. OSM should be under cc-by-sa and not under this new licence.
Comentário de Zartbitter em 25 de novembro de 2010 às 16:39
it is not up to others to judge on hackery's decision.
Comentário de Komяpa em 26 de novembro de 2010 às 07:15
Olli17, any better arguments than "should be"?
Comentário de c2r em 28 de novembro de 2010 às 09:53
My personal view is that I want the data I contribute to continue to be available and of use, even if the worst were to happen, and OSM were to disappear, so I opted for PD. Yes, some people might then try and sell it, but there's more chance others will continue to provide it for free so they will be less successful at this.