My personal view is that I want the data I contribute to continue to be available and of use, even if the worst were to happen, and OSM were to disappear, so I opted for PD. Yes, some people might then try and sell it, but there's more chance others will continue to provide it for free so they will be less successful at this.
OpenStreetMap
Diskussion
Kommentar från Olli17 på 25 november 2010 kl. 13:54
It was an mistake you did. OSM should be under cc-by-sa and not under this new licence.
Kommentar från Zartbitter på 25 november 2010 kl. 16:39
it is not up to others to judge on hackery's decision.
Kommentar från Komяpa på 26 november 2010 kl. 07:15
Olli17, any better arguments than "should be"?
Kommentar från c2r på 28 november 2010 kl. 09:53
My personal view is that I want the data I contribute to continue to be available and of use, even if the worst were to happen, and OSM were to disappear, so I opted for PD. Yes, some people might then try and sell it, but there's more chance others will continue to provide it for free so they will be less successful at this.