...when people assume that the OS names for things are correct, and change the name of a way, even when signs on the ground and local knowledge indicate otherwise...!
خريطة الشارع المفتوحة
...when people assume that the OS names for things are correct, and change the name of a way, even when signs on the ground and local knowledge indicate otherwise...!
مناقشة
تعليق من 42429 في 24 نوفمبر 2011 في 20:56
It would be useful if you had taken a photo as a proof.
تعليق من c2r في 24 نوفمبر 2011 في 21:08
haha, I drive past it every day.... (and if you want to cheat, it's even visible without blanking out on google street view)
تعليق من chriscf في 24 نوفمبر 2011 في 22:32
It could be worse. I had someone add a road that didn't exist straight from StreetView and Locator. I wouldn't have minded as much if they hadn't done it after I'd left hints in the database to the effect of "no, really, this road isn't here".
تعليق من ceyockey في 25 نوفمبر 2011 في 15:28
Are we really to the point that edits need to be backed up by photographic proof? Afterall, c2r indicated "survey" as the source and (s)he has been involved in the project since 2007. It would be different if c2r where a new editor and started on a street name editing spree (vandal behavior).
تعليق من Rom1 في 25 نوفمبر 2011 في 16:25
It also shows that the "source" tag is very important. In the first edit there were no "source" tag...
تعليق من z-dude في 26 نوفمبر 2011 في 07:40
It's silly to assume the 'My data is right everyone else is wrong' attitude.
تعليق من CartogLarry في 24 يوليو 2023 في 12:32
If you add SOURCE then subsequent editors will be able to make a more informed decision before altering…. :)
تعليق من c2r في 24 يوليو 2023 في 14:19
Blast from the past here :D