...when people assume that the OS names for things are correct, and change the name of a way, even when signs on the ground and local knowledge indicate otherwise...!
OpenStreetMap 開放街圖
...when people assume that the OS names for things are correct, and change the name of a way, even when signs on the ground and local knowledge indicate otherwise...!
討論
由 42429 於 2011年11月24日 20時56分 發表的評論
It would be useful if you had taken a photo as a proof.
由 c2r 於 2011年11月24日 21時08分 發表的評論
haha, I drive past it every day.... (and if you want to cheat, it's even visible without blanking out on google street view)
由 chriscf 於 2011年11月24日 22時32分 發表的評論
It could be worse. I had someone add a road that didn't exist straight from StreetView and Locator. I wouldn't have minded as much if they hadn't done it after I'd left hints in the database to the effect of "no, really, this road isn't here".
由 ceyockey 於 2011年11月25日 15時28分 發表的評論
Are we really to the point that edits need to be backed up by photographic proof? Afterall, c2r indicated "survey" as the source and (s)he has been involved in the project since 2007. It would be different if c2r where a new editor and started on a street name editing spree (vandal behavior).
由 Rom1 於 2011年11月25日 16時25分 發表的評論
It also shows that the "source" tag is very important. In the first edit there were no "source" tag...
由 z-dude 於 2011年11月26日 07時40分 發表的評論
It's silly to assume the 'My data is right everyone else is wrong' attitude.
由 CartogLarry 於 2023年07月24日 12時32分 發表的評論
If you add SOURCE then subsequent editors will be able to make a more informed decision before altering…. :)
由 c2r 於 2023年07月24日 14時19分 發表的評論
Blast from the past here :D