...when people assume that the OS names for things are correct, and change the name of a way, even when signs on the ground and local knowledge indicate otherwise...!
OpenStreetMap
...when people assume that the OS names for things are correct, and change the name of a way, even when signs on the ground and local knowledge indicate otherwise...!
Фекер алышыу
42429тарафынан24 November 2011 cәғәт 20:56көндө ҡаралған
It would be useful if you had taken a photo as a proof.
c2rтарафынан24 November 2011 cәғәт 21:08көндө ҡаралған
haha, I drive past it every day.... (and if you want to cheat, it's even visible without blanking out on google street view)
chriscfтарафынан24 November 2011 cәғәт 22:32көндө ҡаралған
It could be worse. I had someone add a road that didn't exist straight from StreetView and Locator. I wouldn't have minded as much if they hadn't done it after I'd left hints in the database to the effect of "no, really, this road isn't here".
ceyockeyтарафынан25 November 2011 cәғәт 15:28көндө ҡаралған
Are we really to the point that edits need to be backed up by photographic proof? Afterall, c2r indicated "survey" as the source and (s)he has been involved in the project since 2007. It would be different if c2r where a new editor and started on a street name editing spree (vandal behavior).
Rom1тарафынан25 November 2011 cәғәт 16:25көндө ҡаралған
It also shows that the "source" tag is very important. In the first edit there were no "source" tag...
z-dudeтарафынан26 November 2011 cәғәт 07:40көндө ҡаралған
It's silly to assume the 'My data is right everyone else is wrong' attitude.
CartogLarryтарафынан24 July 2023 cәғәт 12:32көндө ҡаралған
If you add SOURCE then subsequent editors will be able to make a more informed decision before altering…. :)
c2rтарафынан24 July 2023 cәғәт 14:19көндө ҡаралған
Blast from the past here :D