...when people assume that the OS names for things are correct, and change the name of a way, even when signs on the ground and local knowledge indicate otherwise...!
...when people assume that the OS names for things are correct, and change the name of a way, even when signs on the ground and local knowledge indicate otherwise...!
Diskuse
Komentář od 42429 z 24. 11. 2011 v 20:56
It would be useful if you had taken a photo as a proof.
Komentář od c2r z 24. 11. 2011 v 21:08
haha, I drive past it every day.... (and if you want to cheat, it's even visible without blanking out on google street view)
Komentář od chriscf z 24. 11. 2011 v 22:32
It could be worse. I had someone add a road that didn't exist straight from StreetView and Locator. I wouldn't have minded as much if they hadn't done it after I'd left hints in the database to the effect of "no, really, this road isn't here".
Komentář od ceyockey z 25. 11. 2011 v 15:28
Are we really to the point that edits need to be backed up by photographic proof? Afterall, c2r indicated "survey" as the source and (s)he has been involved in the project since 2007. It would be different if c2r where a new editor and started on a street name editing spree (vandal behavior).
Komentář od Rom1 z 25. 11. 2011 v 16:25
It also shows that the "source" tag is very important. In the first edit there were no "source" tag...
Komentář od z-dude z 26. 11. 2011 v 07:40
It's silly to assume the 'My data is right everyone else is wrong' attitude.
Komentář od CartogLarry z 24. 07. 2023 v 12:32
If you add SOURCE then subsequent editors will be able to make a more informed decision before altering…. :)
Komentář od c2r z 24. 07. 2023 v 14:19
Blast from the past here :D