...when people assume that the OS names for things are correct, and change the name of a way, even when signs on the ground and local knowledge indicate otherwise...!
OpenStreetMap
...when people assume that the OS names for things are correct, and change the name of a way, even when signs on the ground and local knowledge indicate otherwise...!
Discussion
Kommentti käyttäjältä 42429 24. November 2011 klo 20.56
It would be useful if you had taken a photo as a proof.
Kommentti käyttäjältä c2r 24. November 2011 klo 21.08
haha, I drive past it every day.... (and if you want to cheat, it's even visible without blanking out on google street view)
Kommentti käyttäjältä chriscf 24. November 2011 klo 22.32
It could be worse. I had someone add a road that didn't exist straight from StreetView and Locator. I wouldn't have minded as much if they hadn't done it after I'd left hints in the database to the effect of "no, really, this road isn't here".
Kommentti käyttäjältä ceyockey 25. November 2011 klo 15.28
Are we really to the point that edits need to be backed up by photographic proof? Afterall, c2r indicated "survey" as the source and (s)he has been involved in the project since 2007. It would be different if c2r where a new editor and started on a street name editing spree (vandal behavior).
Kommentti käyttäjältä Rom1 25. November 2011 klo 16.25
It also shows that the "source" tag is very important. In the first edit there were no "source" tag...
Kommentti käyttäjältä z-dude 26. November 2011 klo 07.40
It's silly to assume the 'My data is right everyone else is wrong' attitude.
Kommentti käyttäjältä CartogLarry 24. July 2023 klo 12.32
If you add SOURCE then subsequent editors will be able to make a more informed decision before altering…. :)
Kommentti käyttäjältä c2r 24. July 2023 klo 14.19
Blast from the past here :D