...when people assume that the OS names for things are correct, and change the name of a way, even when signs on the ground and local knowledge indicate otherwise...!
اوپن سٹریٹ میپ
...when people assume that the OS names for things are correct, and change the name of a way, even when signs on the ground and local knowledge indicate otherwise...!
Discussion
ایہہ 24؍November 2011ء 20:56 تے «42429» ٹپݨی کیتی گئی سی۔
It would be useful if you had taken a photo as a proof.
ایہہ 24؍November 2011ء 21:08 تے «c2r» ٹپݨی کیتی گئی سی۔
haha, I drive past it every day.... (and if you want to cheat, it's even visible without blanking out on google street view)
ایہہ 24؍November 2011ء 22:32 تے «chriscf» ٹپݨی کیتی گئی سی۔
It could be worse. I had someone add a road that didn't exist straight from StreetView and Locator. I wouldn't have minded as much if they hadn't done it after I'd left hints in the database to the effect of "no, really, this road isn't here".
ایہہ 25؍November 2011ء 15:28 تے «ceyockey» ٹپݨی کیتی گئی سی۔
Are we really to the point that edits need to be backed up by photographic proof? Afterall, c2r indicated "survey" as the source and (s)he has been involved in the project since 2007. It would be different if c2r where a new editor and started on a street name editing spree (vandal behavior).
ایہہ 25؍November 2011ء 16:25 تے «Rom1» ٹپݨی کیتی گئی سی۔
It also shows that the "source" tag is very important. In the first edit there were no "source" tag...
ایہہ 26؍November 2011ء 07:40 تے «z-dude» ٹپݨی کیتی گئی سی۔
It's silly to assume the 'My data is right everyone else is wrong' attitude.
ایہہ 24؍July 2023ء 12:32 تے «CartogLarry» ٹپݨی کیتی گئی سی۔
If you add SOURCE then subsequent editors will be able to make a more informed decision before altering…. :)
ایہہ 24؍July 2023ء 14:19 تے «c2r» ٹپݨی کیتی گئی سی۔
Blast from the past here :D