...when people assume that the OS names for things are correct, and change the name of a way, even when signs on the ground and local knowledge indicate otherwise...!
OpenStreetMap
...when people assume that the OS names for things are correct, and change the name of a way, even when signs on the ground and local knowledge indicate otherwise...!
Discussion
42429ಅವರಿಂದ 20:56 ರಲ್ಲಿ 24 ನವಂಬರ್ 2011ರಂದು ಅಭಿಪ್ರಾಯ
It would be useful if you had taken a photo as a proof.
c2rಅವರಿಂದ 21:08 ರಲ್ಲಿ 24 ನವಂಬರ್ 2011ರಂದು ಅಭಿಪ್ರಾಯ
haha, I drive past it every day.... (and if you want to cheat, it's even visible without blanking out on google street view)
chriscfಅವರಿಂದ 22:32 ರಲ್ಲಿ 24 ನವಂಬರ್ 2011ರಂದು ಅಭಿಪ್ರಾಯ
It could be worse. I had someone add a road that didn't exist straight from StreetView and Locator. I wouldn't have minded as much if they hadn't done it after I'd left hints in the database to the effect of "no, really, this road isn't here".
ceyockeyಅವರಿಂದ 15:28 ರಲ್ಲಿ 25 ನವಂಬರ್ 2011ರಂದು ಅಭಿಪ್ರಾಯ
Are we really to the point that edits need to be backed up by photographic proof? Afterall, c2r indicated "survey" as the source and (s)he has been involved in the project since 2007. It would be different if c2r where a new editor and started on a street name editing spree (vandal behavior).
Rom1ಅವರಿಂದ 16:25 ರಲ್ಲಿ 25 ನವಂಬರ್ 2011ರಂದು ಅಭಿಪ್ರಾಯ
It also shows that the "source" tag is very important. In the first edit there were no "source" tag...
z-dudeಅವರಿಂದ 07:40 ರಲ್ಲಿ 26 ನವಂಬರ್ 2011ರಂದು ಅಭಿಪ್ರಾಯ
It's silly to assume the 'My data is right everyone else is wrong' attitude.
CartogLarryಅವರಿಂದ 12:32 ರಲ್ಲಿ 24 ಜುಲೈ 2023ರಂದು ಅಭಿಪ್ರಾಯ
If you add SOURCE then subsequent editors will be able to make a more informed decision before altering…. :)
c2rಅವರಿಂದ 14:19 ರಲ್ಲಿ 24 ಜುಲೈ 2023ರಂದು ಅಭಿಪ್ರಾಯ
Blast from the past here :D