...when people assume that the OS names for things are correct, and change the name of a way, even when signs on the ground and local knowledge indicate otherwise...!
OpenStreetMap
...when people assume that the OS names for things are correct, and change the name of a way, even when signs on the ground and local knowledge indicate otherwise...!
Pogovor
Komentar uporabnika 42429 dne 24. november 2011 ob 20:56
It would be useful if you had taken a photo as a proof.
Komentar uporabnika c2r dne 24. november 2011 ob 21:08
haha, I drive past it every day.... (and if you want to cheat, it's even visible without blanking out on google street view)
Komentar uporabnika chriscf dne 24. november 2011 ob 22:32
It could be worse. I had someone add a road that didn't exist straight from StreetView and Locator. I wouldn't have minded as much if they hadn't done it after I'd left hints in the database to the effect of "no, really, this road isn't here".
Komentar uporabnika ceyockey dne 25. november 2011 ob 15:28
Are we really to the point that edits need to be backed up by photographic proof? Afterall, c2r indicated "survey" as the source and (s)he has been involved in the project since 2007. It would be different if c2r where a new editor and started on a street name editing spree (vandal behavior).
Komentar uporabnika Rom1 dne 25. november 2011 ob 16:25
It also shows that the "source" tag is very important. In the first edit there were no "source" tag...
Komentar uporabnika z-dude dne 26. november 2011 ob 07:40
It's silly to assume the 'My data is right everyone else is wrong' attitude.
Komentar uporabnika CartogLarry dne 24. julij 2023 ob 12:32
If you add SOURCE then subsequent editors will be able to make a more informed decision before altering…. :)
Komentar uporabnika c2r dne 24. julij 2023 ob 14:19
Blast from the past here :D