...when people assume that the OS names for things are correct, and change the name of a way, even when signs on the ground and local knowledge indicate otherwise...!
...when people assume that the OS names for things are correct, and change the name of a way, even when signs on the ground and local knowledge indicate otherwise...!
Discussion
په 24 November 2011 په 20:56 باندې د 42429 تبصره
It would be useful if you had taken a photo as a proof.
په 24 November 2011 په 21:08 باندې د c2r تبصره
haha, I drive past it every day.... (and if you want to cheat, it's even visible without blanking out on google street view)
په 24 November 2011 په 22:32 باندې د chriscf تبصره
It could be worse. I had someone add a road that didn't exist straight from StreetView and Locator. I wouldn't have minded as much if they hadn't done it after I'd left hints in the database to the effect of "no, really, this road isn't here".
په 25 November 2011 په 15:28 باندې د ceyockey تبصره
Are we really to the point that edits need to be backed up by photographic proof? Afterall, c2r indicated "survey" as the source and (s)he has been involved in the project since 2007. It would be different if c2r where a new editor and started on a street name editing spree (vandal behavior).
په 25 November 2011 په 16:25 باندې د Rom1 تبصره
It also shows that the "source" tag is very important. In the first edit there were no "source" tag...
په 26 November 2011 په 07:40 باندې د z-dude تبصره
It's silly to assume the 'My data is right everyone else is wrong' attitude.
په 24 July 2023 په 12:32 باندې د CartogLarry تبصره
If you add SOURCE then subsequent editors will be able to make a more informed decision before altering…. :)
په 24 July 2023 په 14:19 باندې د c2r تبصره
Blast from the past here :D