...when people assume that the OS names for things are correct, and change the name of a way, even when signs on the ground and local knowledge indicate otherwise...!
OpenStreetMap
...when people assume that the OS names for things are correct, and change the name of a way, even when signs on the ground and local knowledge indicate otherwise...!
Discussion
Cummentu dae 42429 de su 24 santandria 2011 a is 20:56
It would be useful if you had taken a photo as a proof.
Cummentu dae c2r de su 24 santandria 2011 a is 21:08
haha, I drive past it every day.... (and if you want to cheat, it's even visible without blanking out on google street view)
Cummentu dae chriscf de su 24 santandria 2011 a is 22:32
It could be worse. I had someone add a road that didn't exist straight from StreetView and Locator. I wouldn't have minded as much if they hadn't done it after I'd left hints in the database to the effect of "no, really, this road isn't here".
Cummentu dae ceyockey de su 25 santandria 2011 a is 15:28
Are we really to the point that edits need to be backed up by photographic proof? Afterall, c2r indicated "survey" as the source and (s)he has been involved in the project since 2007. It would be different if c2r where a new editor and started on a street name editing spree (vandal behavior).
Cummentu dae Rom1 de su 25 santandria 2011 a is 16:25
It also shows that the "source" tag is very important. In the first edit there were no "source" tag...
Cummentu dae z-dude de su 26 santandria 2011 a is 07:40
It's silly to assume the 'My data is right everyone else is wrong' attitude.
Cummentu dae CartogLarry de su 24 trìulas 2023 a is 12:32
If you add SOURCE then subsequent editors will be able to make a more informed decision before altering…. :)
Cummentu dae c2r de su 24 trìulas 2023 a is 14:19
Blast from the past here :D