...when people assume that the OS names for things are correct, and change the name of a way, even when signs on the ground and local knowledge indicate otherwise...!
OpenStreetMap
...when people assume that the OS names for things are correct, and change the name of a way, even when signs on the ground and local knowledge indicate otherwise...!
Discussão
Comentário de 42429 em 24 de novembro de 2011 às 20:56
It would be useful if you had taken a photo as a proof.
Comentário de c2r em 24 de novembro de 2011 às 21:08
haha, I drive past it every day.... (and if you want to cheat, it's even visible without blanking out on google street view)
Comentário de chriscf em 24 de novembro de 2011 às 22:32
It could be worse. I had someone add a road that didn't exist straight from StreetView and Locator. I wouldn't have minded as much if they hadn't done it after I'd left hints in the database to the effect of "no, really, this road isn't here".
Comentário de ceyockey em 25 de novembro de 2011 às 15:28
Are we really to the point that edits need to be backed up by photographic proof? Afterall, c2r indicated "survey" as the source and (s)he has been involved in the project since 2007. It would be different if c2r where a new editor and started on a street name editing spree (vandal behavior).
Comentário de Rom1 em 25 de novembro de 2011 às 16:25
It also shows that the "source" tag is very important. In the first edit there were no "source" tag...
Comentário de z-dude em 26 de novembro de 2011 às 07:40
It's silly to assume the 'My data is right everyone else is wrong' attitude.
Comentário de CartogLarry em 24 de julho de 2023 às 12:32
If you add SOURCE then subsequent editors will be able to make a more informed decision before altering…. :)
Comentário de c2r em 24 de julho de 2023 às 14:19
Blast from the past here :D