OpenStreetMap標誌 OpenStreetMap

Email icon Bluesky Icon Facebook Icon LinkedIn Icon Mastodon Icon Telegram Icon X Icon

Discussion

Comment from 42429 on 2011年11月24日20:56

It would be useful if you had taken a photo as a proof.

Comment from c2r on 2011年11月24日21:08

haha, I drive past it every day.... (and if you want to cheat, it's even visible without blanking out on google street view)

Comment from chriscf on 2011年11月24日22:32

It could be worse. I had someone add a road that didn't exist straight from StreetView and Locator. I wouldn't have minded as much if they hadn't done it after I'd left hints in the database to the effect of "no, really, this road isn't here".

Comment from ceyockey on 2011年11月25日15:28

Are we really to the point that edits need to be backed up by photographic proof? Afterall, c2r indicated "survey" as the source and (s)he has been involved in the project since 2007. It would be different if c2r where a new editor and started on a street name editing spree (vandal behavior).

Comment from Rom1 on 2011年11月25日16:25

It also shows that the "source" tag is very important. In the first edit there were no "source" tag...

Comment from z-dude on 2011年11月26日07:40

It's silly to assume the 'My data is right everyone else is wrong' attitude.

Comment from CartogLarry on 2023年7月24日12:32

If you add SOURCE then subsequent editors will be able to make a more informed decision before altering…. :)

Comment from c2r on 2023年7月24日14:19

Blast from the past here :D

登入 to leave a comment