...when people assume that the OS names for things are correct, and change the name of a way, even when signs on the ground and local knowledge indicate otherwise...!
OpenStreetMap
...when people assume that the OS names for things are correct, and change the name of a way, even when signs on the ground and local knowledge indicate otherwise...!
Обговорення
Коментар від 42429, 24 Листопада 2011 в 20:56
It would be useful if you had taken a photo as a proof.
Коментар від c2r, 24 Листопада 2011 в 21:08
haha, I drive past it every day.... (and if you want to cheat, it's even visible without blanking out on google street view)
Коментар від chriscf, 24 Листопада 2011 в 22:32
It could be worse. I had someone add a road that didn't exist straight from StreetView and Locator. I wouldn't have minded as much if they hadn't done it after I'd left hints in the database to the effect of "no, really, this road isn't here".
Коментар від ceyockey, 25 Листопада 2011 в 15:28
Are we really to the point that edits need to be backed up by photographic proof? Afterall, c2r indicated "survey" as the source and (s)he has been involved in the project since 2007. It would be different if c2r where a new editor and started on a street name editing spree (vandal behavior).
Коментар від Rom1, 25 Листопада 2011 в 16:25
It also shows that the "source" tag is very important. In the first edit there were no "source" tag...
Коментар від z-dude, 26 Листопада 2011 в 07:40
It's silly to assume the 'My data is right everyone else is wrong' attitude.
Коментар від CartogLarry, 24 Липня 2023 в 12:32
If you add SOURCE then subsequent editors will be able to make a more informed decision before altering…. :)
Коментар від c2r, 24 Липня 2023 в 14:19
Blast from the past here :D