OpenStreetMap 로고 OpenStreetMap

이메일 아이콘 Bluesky 아이콘 Facebook 아이콘 LinkedIn 아이콘 마스토돈 아이콘 텔레그램 아이콘 X 아이콘

토론

2011년 11월 24일 20:5642429님의 의견

It would be useful if you had taken a photo as a proof.

2011년 11월 24일 21:08c2r님의 의견

haha, I drive past it every day.... (and if you want to cheat, it's even visible without blanking out on google street view)

2011년 11월 24일 22:32chriscf님의 의견

It could be worse. I had someone add a road that didn't exist straight from StreetView and Locator. I wouldn't have minded as much if they hadn't done it after I'd left hints in the database to the effect of "no, really, this road isn't here".

2011년 11월 25일 15:28ceyockey님의 의견

Are we really to the point that edits need to be backed up by photographic proof? Afterall, c2r indicated "survey" as the source and (s)he has been involved in the project since 2007. It would be different if c2r where a new editor and started on a street name editing spree (vandal behavior).

2011년 11월 25일 16:25Rom1님의 의견

It also shows that the "source" tag is very important. In the first edit there were no "source" tag...

2011년 11월 26일 07:40z-dude님의 의견

It's silly to assume the 'My data is right everyone else is wrong' attitude.

2023년 7월 24일 12:32CartogLarry님의 의견

If you add SOURCE then subsequent editors will be able to make a more informed decision before altering…. :)

2023년 7월 24일 14:19c2r님의 의견

Blast from the past here :D

댓글을 남기려면 로그인하세요