OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Email icon Bluesky Icon Facebook Icon LinkedIn Icon Mastodon Icon Telegram Icon X Icon

Discussion

Comment from 42429 on 24 ноябрь 2011 сәгать 20:56

It would be useful if you had taken a photo as a proof.

Comment from c2r on 24 ноябрь 2011 сәгать 21:08

haha, I drive past it every day.... (and if you want to cheat, it's even visible without blanking out on google street view)

Comment from chriscf on 24 ноябрь 2011 сәгать 22:32

It could be worse. I had someone add a road that didn't exist straight from StreetView and Locator. I wouldn't have minded as much if they hadn't done it after I'd left hints in the database to the effect of "no, really, this road isn't here".

Comment from ceyockey on 25 ноябрь 2011 сәгать 15:28

Are we really to the point that edits need to be backed up by photographic proof? Afterall, c2r indicated "survey" as the source and (s)he has been involved in the project since 2007. It would be different if c2r where a new editor and started on a street name editing spree (vandal behavior).

Comment from Rom1 on 25 ноябрь 2011 сәгать 16:25

It also shows that the "source" tag is very important. In the first edit there were no "source" tag...

Comment from z-dude on 26 ноябрь 2011 сәгать 07:40

It's silly to assume the 'My data is right everyone else is wrong' attitude.

Comment from CartogLarry on 24 июль 2023 сәгать 12:32

If you add SOURCE then subsequent editors will be able to make a more informed decision before altering…. :)

Comment from c2r on 24 июль 2023 сәгать 14:19

Blast from the past here :D

Керү to leave a comment