OpenStreetMap logoa OpenStreetMap

Email icon Bluesky Icon Facebook Icon LinkedIn Icon Mastodon Icon Telegram Icon X Icon

Eztabaida

42429 erabiltzailearen iruzkina 24 Azaroa 2011 20:56-eann

It would be useful if you had taken a photo as a proof.

c2r erabiltzailearen iruzkina 24 Azaroa 2011 21:08-eann

haha, I drive past it every day.... (and if you want to cheat, it's even visible without blanking out on google street view)

chriscf erabiltzailearen iruzkina 24 Azaroa 2011 22:32-eann

It could be worse. I had someone add a road that didn't exist straight from StreetView and Locator. I wouldn't have minded as much if they hadn't done it after I'd left hints in the database to the effect of "no, really, this road isn't here".

ceyockey erabiltzailearen iruzkina 25 Azaroa 2011 15:28-eann

Are we really to the point that edits need to be backed up by photographic proof? Afterall, c2r indicated "survey" as the source and (s)he has been involved in the project since 2007. It would be different if c2r where a new editor and started on a street name editing spree (vandal behavior).

Rom1 erabiltzailearen iruzkina 25 Azaroa 2011 16:25-eann

It also shows that the "source" tag is very important. In the first edit there were no "source" tag...

z-dude erabiltzailearen iruzkina 26 Azaroa 2011 07:40-eann

It's silly to assume the 'My data is right everyone else is wrong' attitude.

CartogLarry erabiltzailearen iruzkina 24 Uztaila 2023 12:32-eann

If you add SOURCE then subsequent editors will be able to make a more informed decision before altering…. :)

c2r erabiltzailearen iruzkina 24 Uztaila 2023 14:19-eann

Blast from the past here :D

Hasi saioa iruzkin bat uzteko