Logoja e OpenStreetMap OpenStreetMap

Email icon Bluesky Icon Facebook Icon LinkedIn Icon Mastodon Icon Telegram Icon X Icon

Discussion

Koment nga 4242924 Nëntor 2011 te 20:56

It would be useful if you had taken a photo as a proof.

Koment nga c2r24 Nëntor 2011 te 21:08

haha, I drive past it every day.... (and if you want to cheat, it's even visible without blanking out on google street view)

Koment nga chriscf24 Nëntor 2011 te 22:32

It could be worse. I had someone add a road that didn't exist straight from StreetView and Locator. I wouldn't have minded as much if they hadn't done it after I'd left hints in the database to the effect of "no, really, this road isn't here".

Koment nga ceyockey25 Nëntor 2011 te 15:28

Are we really to the point that edits need to be backed up by photographic proof? Afterall, c2r indicated "survey" as the source and (s)he has been involved in the project since 2007. It would be different if c2r where a new editor and started on a street name editing spree (vandal behavior).

Koment nga Rom125 Nëntor 2011 te 16:25

It also shows that the "source" tag is very important. In the first edit there were no "source" tag...

Koment nga z-dude26 Nëntor 2011 te 07:40

It's silly to assume the 'My data is right everyone else is wrong' attitude.

Koment nga CartogLarry24 Korrik 2023 te 12:32

If you add SOURCE then subsequent editors will be able to make a more informed decision before altering…. :)

Koment nga c2r24 Korrik 2023 te 14:19

Blast from the past here :D

Hyr për të lënë një koment